<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forced Remote Firefox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adammonsen.com/post/318/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adammonsen.com/post/318</link>
	<description>blog and sundries of Adam Monsen</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://adammonsen.com/post/318#comment-11717</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 04:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adammonsen.com/post/318#comment-11717</guid>
		<description>Possibly related: I run privoxy at home and have sshd on my dd-wrt linksys router.  I ssh into my router, set up port forwarding to tunnel some port to that remote privoxy, and use Firefox's SwitchProxy add-in to sometimes tunnel my browsing through that route.  It seems that's got to be more lightweight than X tunneling -- but since that's a topic about which I know next to nothing, I could be completely wrong :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Possibly related: I run privoxy at home and have sshd on my dd-wrt linksys router.  I ssh into my router, set up port forwarding to tunnel some port to that remote privoxy, and use Firefox&#8217;s SwitchProxy add-in to sometimes tunnel my browsing through that route.  It seems that&#8217;s got to be more lightweight than X tunneling &#8212; but since that&#8217;s a topic about which I know next to nothing, I could be completely wrong :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
