<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Secure Online Voting</title> <atom:link href="http://adammonsen.com/post/324/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://adammonsen.com/post/324?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=secure-online-voting</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:12:25 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Steven Boger</title><link>http://adammonsen.com/post/324/comment-page-1#comment-11726</link> <dc:creator>Steven Boger</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 01:50:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://adammonsen.com/post/324#comment-11726</guid> <description>Hey Adam,I&#039;m now a Senior Engineer at a German-owned Mobile Carrier in the Messaging Systems/Social Networking department.Seeing first-hand how we deal with Short Messages, my first question is how we would get past dealing with private mobile carriers.  Even if the Mobile Terminating vote ends at a government facility it has to pass through the voters carrier on the way to that endpoint.First, most carriers can&#039;t even handle the New Years rush of SMS&#039;s, with statistics at high as a 30% failure rate and delays in the hours to days.Second, the point from the phone to the carriers SMSC is completely open to tampering.  Also, most carriers rely on a third party to actually hand off the message to a different carrier (or in this case, a government endpoint).  That would mean routing all votes through a single point of failure and tampering.I understand the desire to enable developing countries to vote, and latching onto the idea of cellphones as they are more ubiquitous than computers, but I think the capacity issues and security issues would make it a near impossibility.  I&#039;d rather focus on a per-ward(/district/city) open voting platform with numerous standardized checks and safeguards (all visible, testable, and open to public scrutiny) that is then merged to a main open system and then tallied in real-time to the populace.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Adam,</p><p>I&#8217;m now a Senior Engineer at a German-owned Mobile Carrier in the Messaging Systems/Social Networking department.</p><p>Seeing first-hand how we deal with Short Messages, my first question is how we would get past dealing with private mobile carriers.  Even if the Mobile Terminating vote ends at a government facility it has to pass through the voters carrier on the way to that endpoint.</p><p>First, most carriers can&#8217;t even handle the New Years rush of SMS&#8217;s, with statistics at high as a 30% failure rate and delays in the hours to days.</p><p>Second, the point from the phone to the carriers SMSC is completely open to tampering.  Also, most carriers rely on a third party to actually hand off the message to a different carrier (or in this case, a government endpoint).  That would mean routing all votes through a single point of failure and tampering.</p><p>I understand the desire to enable developing countries to vote, and latching onto the idea of cellphones as they are more ubiquitous than computers, but I think the capacity issues and security issues would make it a near impossibility.  I&#8217;d rather focus on a per-ward(/district/city) open voting platform with numerous standardized checks and safeguards (all visible, testable, and open to public scrutiny) that is then merged to a main open system and then tallied in real-time to the populace.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: adammonsen.com @ 2012-02-11 00:42:04 -->
